Power and economy

 Well, first, a little about economy, and I anticipate this might be

a bit rough.  


I have mentioned that I believe there is a connection to what

is often referred to as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum

mechanics and economy.  


So economy represents what you might call a collection of

exchanges.  We also might be able to distinguish complexity of

exchanges, because they can be from 1 to multiple.  Next,

the issue is the benefit of the exchange which for each connection

can have  various different values.  Based on that it  seems

clear to me that this configuration represents some type of

multi-dimensional Hilbert space.  My guess is

that the behavior of transactions might resemble in some

respects the kind of relationship that exists among the atomic

constituents of the periodic table.


Moving on to power.  Power is usually and perhaps correctly

connected to energy, but for me the association with work is

more clear than energy and power .


As you can clearly see, in the Hilbert space constructed ( as kind of

constructed ) above, work is clearly an exchange.   Clearly 

one purpose of economy would be to maximize to a great extent

the the benefits derived from the exchanges we refer to as work.


Previously I mentioned, power and control which are obviously

connected in the context of economy, but are clearly different.


One issue is,  what are some sources of power.  It seems to

me , like we can see the wind as a source of power in the natural

world and there should be some sources of power as well in the economic

world or space, that we can perceive.  My guess is that

sources of power should  in fact increase benefits in exchanges. 






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

World Peace

Zen and fighting

Is life fair?