Power and economy
Well, first, a little about economy, and I anticipate this might be
a bit rough.
I have mentioned that I believe there is a connection to what
is often referred to as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum
mechanics and economy.
So economy represents what you might call a collection of
exchanges. We also might be able to distinguish complexity of
exchanges, because they can be from 1 to multiple. Next,
the issue is the benefit of the exchange which for each connection
can have various different values. Based on that it seems
clear to me that this configuration represents some type of
multi-dimensional Hilbert space. My guess is
that the behavior of transactions might resemble in some
respects the kind of relationship that exists among the atomic
constituents of the periodic table.
Moving on to power. Power is usually and perhaps correctly
connected to energy, but for me the association with work is
more clear than energy and power .
As you can clearly see, in the Hilbert space constructed ( as kind of
constructed ) above, work is clearly an exchange. Clearly
one purpose of economy would be to maximize to a great extent
the the benefits derived from the exchanges we refer to as work.
Previously I mentioned, power and control which are obviously
connected in the context of economy, but are clearly different.
One issue is, what are some sources of power. It seems to
me , like we can see the wind as a source of power in the natural
world and there should be some sources of power as well in the economic
world or space, that we can perceive. My guess is that
sources of power should in fact increase benefits in exchanges.
Comments
Post a Comment