Violence and non-violence
Well, I guess this is a " deep " subject, but non the less,
I think if we just go back to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.,
we may get a taste for just how important a topic this is,
by observing how important it was to him. It was the
foundation of what he built organizationally, in his career,
which would most correctly be referred to as ministry.
Of course, Dr. King was not dumb, in any stretch of the
imagination. He was however quite determined, methodical,
and focused in his efforts. I might add quite energetic.
However, he did know that he was up against it, so to speak.
It wasn't like humanity had discovered violence in the 1940's.
We do have quite a history of it, in fact, history wouldn't be the
same without it.
So, what does this all mean? What makes us happy, which
is the state we strive for, in fact included in the idea of what
the U.S. government is involved with, then we must strive
for compassion and empathy ( it would take me most of the
day to make that sentence readable , so ) . I do think, that
reducing violence and achieving greater harmony in the world
is indeed possible. It is achievable. That is of course, only an
opinion.
And so to put it simply, it's an effort, meaning work to achieve,
but -- as they say -- frankly, it is a worth while goal.
Now, just who is that Frank guy?
Comments
Post a Comment